Hey, look everybody! It’s part of an interview with Nolan in Newsweek discussing “The Dark Knight” and I’m just wondering if this counts as author intent or real-life context.
“Historians may look back on the summer of 2008 and conclude that America’s embrace of The Dark Knight personified its fatal ignorance of reality.”
What you must also remember is that this film is a real continuation of Batman Begins. Just as Godfather II builds on Godfather, The Dark Knight builds on Batman Begins. Hence we have the Scarecrow loose end taken care of.
One of the biggest problems we face right now has to do with the belittling of “Risk” by certain (not necessarily Neo-cons) self-serving elements. With The Dark Knight I see a popular entertainment presenting (with a ham fist) the philosophical arguments of the “risk the belittlers” — which is why I find it profoundly stupid and offensive.
Also, as any half-way serious scholar will tell you, you can read just about any political message into about any text you want. What makes a particular interpretation valid is both author intent and real-life context. If you can find any interview with Nolan where he claims to be presenting “a confrontation between the pillars of old school capitalist theory” I will defer to your analysis. Or if you can find any connection between anything in the movie inspiring any real-life actions or events, I’d love to hear about it. But drawing a link between people liking Batman movie and the final collapse of an economy that was set in motion years earlier is much more specious than anything presented in the film.
This essay Batman Essays argues that Batman Essays Frank Miller's Batman: The Dark Knight Returns (1986) and Batman: The Dark Knight Strikes Again (2001-02) are grounded in a specific
11 Mar 2011 I am going to closely analyse the two main characters, Batman and his arch Our Service Can Write a Custom Essay on Batman Essays Batman for Batman Essays You!
The Dark Knight Rises (2. Trivia. During the football sequence shown in the preview a player is seen wearing a jersey with the last name of Ravenstahl on it. This is Luke R. Ravenstahl, the Mayor of Pittsburgh, where portions of the movie were shot. He was Washington & Jefferson college's starting place kicker on the football team for three years and was team captain for his senior year. He holds the school record for most consecutive extra points.
Although it is believed that The Dark Knight Return copied sophistication and quality from Watchmen, The Dark Knight Return story is based on Bruce Wayne who was a billionaire at the time he was being featured in the book.
Movie Soundtrack Analysis: The Dark Knight
In order to fully understand the analysis of the music utilized, one must first watch the scene.
Song: "You're Gonna Love Me" or
"Why So Serious?"
Composer: Hans Zimmer
It is important to first note that when composing this song, Hans Zimmer took a minimalist approach and therefore might be lacking the range of other scores.
With only one more day until The Dark Knight Rises, it seems like a good time for one last batch of publicity images from the eagerly anticipated film.
But of course, it’s not — Lau’s capture is only the beginning. Bruce, in his desire to upset the status quo and rewrite the rules of (out)law and (dis)order in Gotham City creates a wildly unstable new environment, and by the end of Act II, Bruce will be forced to abandon his Batman persona and sacrifice himself, yet again, for the city he loves — that is, until Harvey Dent steals his thunder and turns, in the public eye, from White Knight to Dark Knight.
Before we continue, behold the structure of Act III of . It begins with a smashing chase scene, then moves straight into an extended multi-threaded suspense sequence, which culminates in the death of one character and the transformation of another. It delivers the narrative low-point for the protagonist, then kind of for another ten minutes or so. This odd little post-climactic interlude between Act III and Act IV, a little mini-act of itself, maps out Harvey’s transition from Harvey to Two-Face includes the end of the Joker’s relationship with the “establishment” (hint: the split is not amicable) and his nurturing of Harvey’s transition from white knight to villain. During this interlude, Bruce acts as a superhero without putting on his mask (unless you count behaving as a dim-witted billionaire playboy a mask), and the Joker destroys a hospital in order to cover up the disappearance of Harvey.
A very well written analysis. While I agree with many of your themes, I still cannot accept the rationale behind the ending. While your explanation of why Bruce thinks he deserves some sort of punishment for causing the events in the film, pinning these events on Bruce does not lay with him, but rather with Gordon. It’s Gordon and his family’s testimony that will brand Batman as a criminal, and I don’t buy Gordon’s rationale for making the decision for one minute.